Russia–Ukraine War Update: The Latest Assaults, Peace Efforts & Political Shake-Ups

The war in Ukraine just took several major turns that are reshaping the conflict's trajectory. From the largest Russian aerial bombardment in weeks to high-stakes peace talks gaining momentum, here's what Missouri business owners and anyone tracking global stability need to know about the latest developments.

Russia Launches Its Biggest Attack in a Month

Just as peace negotiations were set to begin, Russia unleashed one of its most devastating aerial assaults in recent weeks. The November 28th attack killed at least three people in Kyiv alone and left dozens wounded across multiple Ukrainian cities.

The numbers tell the story: Russia fired over 600 drones and 35 missiles in a coordinated bombardment that targeted civilian areas and critical infrastructure. Ukrainian air defenses managed to intercept 63 of 72 drones, but the nine that got through, along with one missile, struck five separate locations.

This wasn't just another routine attack. The timing: right before peace talks: suggests Russia wanted to negotiate from a position of strength. It's a classic tactic we've seen throughout this conflict: escalate militarily while pursuing diplomatic solutions.

The human cost keeps mounting. In Dnipropetrovsk Oblast, a Russian glide bomb killed a 61-year-old man. The death toll from a November 19th strike on Ternopil has now risen to 35 people after DNA testing confirmed additional victims, including six children.

Peace Talks Gain Real Momentum

Despite the ongoing violence, behind-the-scenes diplomatic efforts are picking up steam. A Ukrainian delegation is heading to the United States for discussions with Trump envoy Steve Witkoff about a potential peace framework backed by the incoming administration.

The most significant development? Serious discussions about a temporary 30-day ceasefire. U.S. and European diplomatic teams are pushing both sides toward this pause, which could create space for broader negotiations.

This isn't just diplomatic theater. Both sides seem genuinely interested in finding an off-ramp, even if they're approaching it from different angles. Russia wants to consolidate its territorial gains, while Ukraine needs time to rebuild and rearm.

For global markets and supply chains that many Missouri businesses depend on, even a temporary ceasefire could provide much-needed stability. Energy prices, grain exports, and shipping routes through the Black Sea all hang in the balance.

Political Shake-Up in Kyiv

Ukrainian President Zelensky just made his biggest political move since the war began, dismissing his chief of staff Andriy Yermak amid a massive corruption scandal. This isn't some minor cabinet shuffle: Yermak was widely considered Zelensky's "right-hand man" and one of the most powerful figures in Ukrainian government.

The corruption probe involves $100 million, and authorities have already raided Yermak's home and offices. While Yermak says he's cooperating fully and reportedly planning to head to the frontlines, his departure signals that even wartime Ukraine isn't immune to internal accountability pressures.

This political housecleaning comes at a crucial moment for peace negotiations. Western allies have been pressuring Ukraine to crack down on corruption as a condition for continued aid. Yermak's resignation sends a clear signal that Zelensky is serious about reform, which could strengthen Ukraine's position in upcoming talks.

Ukraine's Military Strikes Back Hard

While diplomatic channels heat up, Ukraine's military has scored some impressive tactical victories. Ukrainian forces just destroyed $60 million worth of Russian air defense systems over three days, including advanced Pantsir S1 and Tor-M2 missile systems.

The most eye-catching operation? Ukraine struck deep into Russian territory, hitting the Saratov oil refinery and destroying a drone storage facility at an airfield in Russian-occupied Crimea. These aren't just symbolic attacks: they're targeting the infrastructure Russia needs to sustain its war effort.

Ukrainian forces are also making progress on the ground. Near Huliaipole in Zaporizhzhia Oblast, Ukrainian troops repelled a major Russian offensive and regained control of contested areas. The 33rd Separate Assault Regiment led the counterattack, though fighting continues on the city's outskirts.

Perhaps most significantly, Ukraine claims to have hit Putin's "shadow fleet" oil tankers in the Black Sea. These vessels have been crucial for Russia's efforts to circumvent international sanctions on oil exports.

What This Means for Business and Global Stability

For Missouri business owners watching these developments, several trends deserve attention:

Energy Markets: Ukraine's strikes on Russian oil infrastructure could affect global energy prices, especially if attacks escalate. Companies with energy-intensive operations should monitor fuel cost fluctuations.

Supply Chain Impacts: A potential 30-day ceasefire could temporarily stabilize shipping routes and grain exports. Agricultural businesses in Missouri should watch for changes in international grain prices.

Currency Fluctuations: Major military escalations often trigger currency volatility. Businesses with international exposure should consider hedging strategies.

The corruption crackdown in Ukraine also signals stronger governance, which could affect future reconstruction contracts and international investment flows.

War Crimes Investigations Continue

Even as peace talks advance, accountability efforts continue. Ukraine's Security Service just charged four Russian soldiers for a June attack on Sumy's city center that killed six civilians and injured over 30.

More disturbing, Russian troops executed a captured Ukrainian soldier near Pokrovsk after beating him with an assault rifle. These documented war crimes will likely complicate any future peace negotiations, as Ukraine demands accountability alongside territorial agreements.

Territorial Disputes Still Unresolved

Russian President Putin recently claimed full control of Kupiansk, a strategically important city. Ukrainian Commander Oleksandr Syrskyi quickly rejected this claim, stating that Ukrainian forces continue defensive operations and hold their designated lines.

These competing territorial claims highlight why peace negotiations remain so challenging. Both sides are fighting for facts on the ground that will determine their negotiating positions.

Why a Stronger U.S. Role—Including a Temporary Occupation—May Be Necessary

Hard truth: the current mix of massive drone-and-missile volleys, shaky ceasefire talk, and political churn in Kyiv isn’t stopping the bleeding. If the actual goal is to stop the war fast and protect civilians, a U.S.-led, multinational temporary occupation of key zones in Ukraine should be on the table. That means a disciplined stabilization mission with clear objectives, not an open‑ended commitment.

The case, in plain English:

• Russia’s intensified assaults: The largest strike in weeks hit right before talks, killing civilians and targeting infrastructure. That’s leverage-building by force, not a pathway to peace.

• Peace talks stalling risk: Even with chatter about a 30‑day ceasefire, we’ve seen how “pauses” get broken. War crimes investigations and fresh strikes make any paper deal fragile before it starts.

• Leadership shake-up in Kyiv: Zelensky’s dismissal of a top aide amid a $100M corruption probe signals internal turbulence. Cleaning house is good, but the churn creates uncertainty that Moscow exploits.

• Humanitarian toll keeps climbing: Civilians killed in Kyiv and Dnipropetrovsk, children among the dead in Ternopil, and documented executions of POWs. That’s a crisis that demands enforceable protection, not just promises.

What a limited occupation would aim to do:

• Enforce any ceasefire with real consequences for violations, creating genuine breathing room for negotiations.

• Secure critical infrastructure and humanitarian corridors so power, water, hospitals, and grain flows aren’t held hostage.

• Establish protected zones for displaced families and enable on-the-ground documentation of war crimes.

• Create conditions for credible final-status talks by stabilizing the front and reducing incentives for surprise offensives.

Why this matters to Americans and U.S. businesses:

• Stability lowers energy and grain price shocks that ripple into fuel bills, food costs, and shipping. Predictable Black Sea routes help global supply chains.

• A firm, time-bound U.S.-led presence deters a wider NATO crisis that would be far more costly in lives and dollars.

• Ending a grinding war sooner is cheaper than funding years of stalemate and rebuilding a larger disaster later.

Guardrails that keep this responsible and finite:

• Coalition-based mission with clear legal authorities and burden sharing with allies.

• Tight, public mandate: protect civilians, enforce ceasefire lines, secure infrastructure—then transition to Ukrainian and EU civilian missions.

• Defined exit timeline tied to measurable milestones (verified ceasefire compliance, secured corridors, and active final-status talks).

• Rules of engagement that prioritize civilian protection and de-escalation while credibly deterring further attacks.

• 
  

Bottom line: Violence is accelerating, “talks” are fragile, Kyiv is managing internal shocks, and civilians are paying the price. A focused, temporary U.S.-led occupation of key areas—done with allies, tight objectives, and a clear exit—offers the fastest path to stop the killing, stabilize markets, and force serious negotiations.

Looking Ahead: Cautious Optimism with Real Risks

The convergence of military pressure, diplomatic momentum, and internal political changes creates the most promising environment for peace talks since the war

began. However, several factors could derail progress:

• Continued military escalation could undermine trust

• Internal political pressures in both countries may limit negotiating flexibility

• International allies must coordinate their positions carefully

• War crimes accountability remains a major sticking point

For businesses and individuals tracking global stability, the next 30-60 days will be crucial. A successful temporary ceasefire could lead to broader negotiations, while failure might result in further escalation.

The bottom line: Ukraine and Russia are both feeling pressure to find a diplomatic solution, but neither side is ready to make the compromises necessary for lasting peace. The proposed 30-day ceasefire represents the best near-term hope for reducing violence and creating space for more substantial negotiations.

As this situation develops rapidly, staying informed through reliable sources becomes essential for making sound business and investment decisions in an increasingly interconnected global economy.

---

Guest analysis provided by Sarah Chen, International Correspondent for Amerishop Services